Kim Nicholas
  • Welcome
  • About
    • Lab Members
    • Kim's Visual CV
    • Kim's Full CV
    • Kim's 2 page CV
  • Research
    • Peer-Reviewed Publications
    • Flying Less >
      • The Takeoff of Staying on the Ground
      • Policy Briefs
      • Ingen ny tid för avgång
      • Academics Flying Less
    • Radically Reducing Lund's Emissions
    • Climate Solutions >
      • Responding to Climate Change
      • Fyra klimatsmarta livsstilsval
      • Climate Science 101
      • Climate Policy >
        • IPCC Report on 1.5°
        • Kims Klimatval
        • COP21 (Paris Agreement)
      • Farmer adaptation
      • Harnessing biodiversity
    • Climate Education
    • Sustainable Land >
      • Global land use
      • European farming systems
      • Swedish land use
      • Ecosystem Services & OPERAs
      • REDD+
      • Land Acquisitions
    • Sustainable Food >
      • Urban Food Forestry
      • Local food in Iceland
      • One Great Meal
      • Dietary choices & climate change
      • Crop yields & climate
    • Wine, Climate, & Sustainability >
      • Wine & Climate: Impacts & Solutions
      • Wine Diversity for Climate Adaptation
      • Wine yields & quality under climate change
      • Farmer climate adaptation
      • Vineyard ecosystems & landscapes
      • European Wine Case Studies (OPERAs)
    • For Kids (K-12)
  • Teaching
    • Courses >
      • Earth Systems Science
      • Writing for Change >
        • Course Readings
        • Apply
        • Course Information
    • Climate Change Curriculum
    • We Can Fix It World Cafe >
      • We Can Fix It World Cafe 2017
      • We Can Fix It World Cafe 2016
      • We Can Fix It World Cafe 2015
      • We Can Fix It World Cafe 2014
    • Peer Writing Tutors >
      • Instructions for Peer Tutors
      • Apply to be a writing tutor!
    • Student-Led Exams >
      • Simplified Self Grading
      • DIY Exam Teaching Notes
      • Peer Grading
      • Self Grading
    • Early Career
    • R Tutorials >
      • R tutorial 1: Basic calculations and graphs
      • R tutorial 2: Data Visualization
    • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
    • Advice for Students
  • Writing
    • Book >
      • Order Book
    • Newsletter
    • Magazines & Popular Science
    • Blog
  • Upcoming Events
  • Talks
    • Podcasts & Audio Interviews
    • Past Talks
    • Slideshare
    • Videos
  • Press
    • Press på svenska
  • Activism & Opinion

Tips and tools for digital teaching and creating teaching portfolios

11/29/2016

 
Here’s a short summary I co-wrote with Céline Fernandez compiling the highlights of our November meeting for the LuPOD professional development program. ​
Picture
Image from https://www.roberthalf.com/creativegroup/blog/how-to-put-together-your-first-professional-portfolio
Tools for digital learning:
  • Voto.se: to create quiz and have participants voting in real time
  • Kahoot: to create learning games​
Best practices for films for educational purposes:
  • Max length: 5 min
  • Availability: no more than 2 clicks to access
  • Sound quality is important to the viewer
  • Think about the voice melody of the speakers (no monotonous tone)
  • Lifetime: since the film will most probably remain on the web for a long time, use a layout that is likely to age well   
 
Issue regarding available learning material online: often no quality control. Therefore, make sure to review material before assigning, point out to students to be critical when using information online, and consider making your own material.
 
 
Teaching portfolios
  • Why you need one: it helps you document and reflect on your teaching, and may be required for application to positions (e.g., lecturer or docent) or for merits like the Pedagogical Academy/Excellent Teaching Practitioner.
  • Get a model: Applications for positions (such as Docent) at Lund University are public documents and should be available on request. These are valuable to study when working on your own application. Also ask colleagues to share their successful applications for inspiration.
  • Pedagogical philosophy: Get beyond buzzwords from LATHE courses and show how you expressed pedagogical ideas in practice.
  • Pedagogical reflection: Give both good and bad examples from your teaching practice to demonstrate your own reflection and development.
  • Scholarship of teaching and learning: taking an investigative approach to teaching and learning, applying an iterative cycle of reflection and improvement.
 
References and further reading:
  • Application for Excellent Teaching Practitioner at Lund University, including instructions for the teaching portfolio required, are listed by faculty. Here are links to the Social Science Faculty and LTH, which were easy to find in English on the Lund website. :) 

Open Data, Part 1 

4/26/2016

 
Picture
Photo credit: justgrimes on Flickr
Science should be open. Duh. 

Easier said than done.

There are many reasons why this fails.

​Personally, I think mostly it's well-intentioned, busy people who don't follow best practices from the beginning, then don't want to spend the time cleaning up their Rube Goldberg-esque Excel sheets later.

I've definitely been there. But I'm trying to get better, and trying to help those in my lab establish good habits. 

For my last lab meeting, we discussed best practices in open data, based on this paper by my friend and colleague Lizzie Wolkovich. 

Everyone in my lab is now working on curating our own data for a current project, including making a diagram of our workflow, and organizing our data cleanly, with good meta-data. 

This is a work in progress, but here are a few resources I've found helpful: 

1. Lizzie's paper, "Advances in global change research require open science by individual researchers," gives a great motivation for why open data matters, what stands in its way, and how to design research to be open. 

2. Ten simple tips for how to design a clean spreadsheet, by @robinhouston and @SeanClarke (hint: commas, asterisks, and color-coding don't belong). 

3. Thirteen more elaborate but still simple and important tips for effective data management (what you wish you knew at the beginning of your research career, instead of learning the hard way, like always using full, consistent format for dates). 

4.  Lizzie's "Ze Template" for organizing project meta-data (what the study is about, what files it involves, where they're located), under Creative Commons license. Yay open science, and yay Lizzie! 


We're going to keep talking about this in my lab, including issues with open data in qualitative research (confidentiality, subjectivity of observations)- if you have any references on this, please let me know! 

Teaching retreat: realtime surveys, online lectures & more

3/4/2016

 
This week was the first teaching retreat for teachers in USV, Lund University's division for faculty-free centers ranging from the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies to my own department of LUCSUS, the centre for sustainability studies. About 25 teachers stayed at a former church in the town of Höör, 25 minutes by train from Lund. 

Over two days, we learned new tools and approaches for teaching, and had time to share our ideas and learn from each other. Some of the main tools I learned about: 
  1. Live voting using smartphones in class to check student understanding

    The Swedish company Mentimeter has designed a simple, free interface where teachers can set up questions (multiple choice or open answer), and students vote online or with their smartphones. You can see the anonymous votes accumulate in real time. Useful to check student understanding after discussion, keep engagement high, correct misconceptions. 
    ​
  2. The "flipped" classroom 

    "Flipped" classrooms use student time at home to read, watch video lectures, and do quizzes; and then use class time for active tasks like discussion and group activities (rather than passive absorption of lecture material). This model changes the role of the teacher from "sage on the stage" to "guide on the side".  We were encouraged to try this model and shown some data on how effective it can be for student learning. 

  3. Filming lectures for online & MOOCs 

    Online lectures are increasingly popular for MOOCs (massive online open courses), or as part of a traditional or flipped classroom. We were advised that a good video lecture for student learning is short (5-9 minutes), where the teacher addresses students directly (not students in another classroom), shows passion, and underlines important ideas. The video/audio quality isn't critical for student learning (as long as you can be clearly seen and heard), so don't worry about fancy technology- the webcam on your computer is good enough! 

    Lund University has a new tool, LU Play, for recording screencasts of lectures. We played around with it a bit- quite easy to use to film slides and your presentation, and you can include interactive quizzes. One disadvantage though is that it's only available internally to LU students logged in with a Stil-account, and not easy to upload directly to YouTube or other public platforms (you have to download to your own computer first), which made me wonder about archiving and long-term access. 

    I found a good video from UBC professor Rosie Redfield on why and how she records her lectures herself, with encouraging tips and helpful explanation of the technology she uses. Also it seems that the free open-source Open Broadcaster Software is a good option for recording screencasts (though a little less intuitive than LU Play at first). 

  4. Syllabus design 
    We discussed the purpose and role of a course syllabus with Katarina Mårtensson Lund University Division for Higher Education Development (AHU). She pointed out all the different roles that a syllabus can play, including: forcing the teacher to focus and prioritize, making the learning outcomes visible, as a communication tool between teachers and students, between teachers to focus on overall program coherency, and to help new teachers who inherit a course, or have to take over on short notice. 

    We reviewed a syllabus from a colleague from another department and gave feedback on questions we would have as a student. This made me realize the importance of being familiar with similar courses to highlight what distinguishes my course (so I should do a syllabus review when designing a course, similar to a literature review for writing an academic paper).

Top scientists weigh in on the current draft of Paris climate agreement

12/11/2015

 
Note: This blog post now appears on the Road to Paris platform. 
A panel of leading scientists told an overflowing room that aiming for global zero carbon emissions by 2050, including an emissions peak by 2020, would be necessary to meet the 1.5° temperature target mentioned in the latest text of the global climate agreement being hammered out by negotiators behind closed doors since its release at 21:00 last night.
 
The level of ambition has been at the heart of the current agreement, with a monumental shift this week when over 100 countries including the US, all EU member countries, and 79 African, Caribbean, and Pacific countries have supported the aim to limit warming to 1.5 degrees above preindustrial temperatures as part of the “high ambition coalition.”
Picture
Johan Rockström of the Stockhölm Resilience Centre noted that the current text “still has the possibility of transformational change,” with the number one goal to limit warming as far below 2° as possible.
 
Taking as a given the increasing risks posed by increasing temperatures caused by continued emissions, the panel focused on how to achieve the targets currently under discussion, linking it to language in the text that would make the goal consistent with science.
 
Prof. Hans Schellnhuber of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research confirmed the benchmark that, for a decent chance of meeting a temperature target, the world has to get CO2 out of the system by 2050 for the 1.5 degree target, and by 2070 for 2 degrees. He stated this would require 2% reductions every year to decrease linearly to zero, further noting this was technically possible, and that Germany has been pursuing this goal faster than expected.
Picture
The current text calls for "GHG neutrality in second half of the century," which leaves the door open to the necessary zero carbon emissions, but does not ensure it.
 
Several panelists raised concerns about the current “greenhouse gas neutrality” language. Prof. Kevin Anderson of the University of Manchester said the language of neutrality masks the need for “negative emissions,” removal of carbon from the atmosphere using largely unproven means.
 
Schellnhuber echoed the concern that negative emissions were a “gamble,” further stating that every country has to go for complete decarbonization by 2050 to meet the 1.5 degree target.
 
Rockström agreed, stating that "decarbonization" was a better long-term qualitative goal than greenhouse gas neutrality. He further warned the audience that staying under 2 degrees is also about keeping carbon in rainforests and other ecosystems, a service that becomes riskier at higher temperatures due to feedbacks between the land and atmosphere.
 
For any chance of 1.5°, Rockstrom continued that the richest nations (such as the EU, US, Australia, and other OECD countries) need to lead the charge to zero fossil fuel use at 2030, in order to leave some space in the carbon budget for developing countries to transition slightly more slowly to decarbonization. He noted that this is a very ambitious target, which the current climate pledges, or intended nationally determined contributions, do not yet meet.
 
Kevin Anderson stressed the critical nature of aligning national pledges with the agreed target over time through a robust, regular review process going forward, which Rockstrom suggested could occur every 2-3 years, as part of regular Conference of the Party meetings.
 
Joeri Rogelj of IIASA noted that scenarios consistent with the 1.5 target are expected to achieve global peak emissions by 2020. Noting this date leaves no time to waste, Rogelj said, “We must start rapid emission reductions, and not count on carbon capture and storage later.”
 
As everyone at Le Bourget anxiously awaits the next round of text, Prof. Schellnhuber cited his long experience with the climate negotiations process, saying that the second to last text that we now have available was “always stronger” than the final text, as parties had to compromise to reach agreement. He called the current text “extremely progressive, believe it or not,” though he warned that even the current softer goal of “greenhouse gas neutrality after mid-century” could disappear in the final wranglings over the next few hours.
 
Looking ahead, journalist Mark Hertsgaard asked “What has to happen in the next 18 months, not just the next 18 hours, from all governments to be realistic about 1.5?”
 
Kevin Anderson cited a role for individuals, noting a new report showing that 50% of global CO2 emissions come from just 10% of the population. He said this means that energy demand (reducing high-CO2 activities like flying) needs to be reduced by high emitters, including “most of us in this room.”
 
Schellnhuber said that the Paris Agreement will send a message to civil society- and it will be the work of business, cities, investors, and all of us to finish the job. He concluded that COP21 has to make the 1.5 to 2 degree target consistent with long-term actions, and “if they do their job, we'll be fine." 

Picture

Draft Paris Agreement Analysis 

12/10/2015

 
Picture
Word cloud of the entire Draft Paris Agreement released Thursday night. It's a party!
The new text of the Draft Paris Agreement dropped at 21h on Thursday at the UN climate summit. From the word cloud above, you can see that it's an agreement that shall develop into a party. And where nations should take action to meet, adapt, build, support, and implement! 

There was a frantic rush for printers and the document center as delegates, observers and press scurried to take in the new document, which COP President Laurent Fabius said was the second to last text, aiming to finalize tomorrow into the "u
niversal, legally binding, ambitious, fair, lasting agreement that the world's waiting for. I think we'll make it."
Picture
Analysis by my friends at parisagreement.org (below) shows that we're down to just 48 brackets, or points of contention. The Parties are now hashing these out in a closed-door "solutions indaba", to the disappointment of keen observers. 
Picture
While we wait to see what will emerge in the morning, you can see a helpful ongoing analysis of the text evolution (what's in, what's out) at the Deconstructing Paris blog, and catch up on who's said what at the negotiations (that were open to observers) with accuracy, insight, and funny GIFs at the Google doc run by COP21 heroes @LaingHamish and @ryanmearns. For the full GIF-based reaction to COP21, try Leehi's ParIsThisIt?  
Creative Commons License
Draft Paris Agreement Word Cloud by Kimberly Nicholas is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Global breadbaskets at risk from unchecked greenhouse gas emissions

12/2/2015

 
​Our new study shows trouble ahead for feeding the world under a warmer climate, with yields for staple grains declining more sharply with greater warming if high emissions of greenhouse gases continue.

​If emissions are reduced to the level represented by the current climate pledges at the start of the Paris summit (where carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere stabilize around 550ppm), yields of corn in Iowa are projected to be similar to today (or even experience a slight increase of 6%). However, continued high emissions leading to greater warming would be expected to produce a 21% decline in yields.
 
The news is worse for wheat yields in southeast Australia. This region already struggles with drought in a crop system that relies on rainfall, and climate models consistently project the area will get warmer and drier in the future. This combination spells potential yield declines of 50% under lower warming, and 70% under greater warming: extremely challenging conditions for continued wheat production in the region.
Picture
Average projected changes for temperature, precipitation, and yields for wheat in Southeastern Australia and maize (corn) in Iowa under two scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions. Under the lower scenario, maize yields in Iowa increase 6%, while they decline 21% under higher emissions. Wheat yields in Southeast Australia are projected to decrease 50% under lower warming, and 70% under higher warming, exacerbated by drier conditions in the future. Projections are for the end of the century (2070-2100) compared with a historical baseline (1951-1980). An interactive version of this figure, with results for each climate model and scenario, is available here. Figure by Martin Jung using data from Ummenhofer et al. 2015.

​The study, published in the Journal of Climate, found that yields of staple cereal were very sensitive to changes in climate. In particular, we found that, on average, each increase of 1°C (1.8°F) in temperature resulted in a yield decrease of 10% for corn in Iowa, and 15% for wheat in Southeastern Australia. This means that limiting warming through reduced heat-trapping pollutants is important to maintain the productivity of today’s breadbaskets.
 
Both crops were also highly influenced by rainfall. Each decrease in precipitation of 10mm (0.39 inches) resulted in a yield decrease of 12% for Iowan corn and 9% for Australian wheat. Australia is predicted to experience substantially drier conditions in the future, which contributes to the large yield declines projected.
 
In addition to average yields, we examined the conditions that produced extremely high and extremely low yields in the past, since weathering these extremes are important for farmers to maintain viability.
 
Our analysis showed that, in the past, high yields of corn in Iowa tended to happen in particularly rainy years, with dry years spelling trouble for corn yields. Fortunately for Iowa, the changes projected for rainfall in the future are relatively small, with little difference between the higher and lower greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. However, the six computer models we used to simulate future climate make different projections, with half predicting a slight increase in rainfall (and therefore an increase in future good yields), while others predict somewhat less rain (and more tough years for corn). 
High yields of wheat in southeast Australia were also associated with wetter years in the past. Such years are consistently predicted to become less common in the future: all climate models and emissions scenarios agree in predicting a major increase in extremely bad years, where more than two-thirds of years will have yields 20% or more below today’s average.  
 
The implications of this work are that increasing temperatures and rainfall variability from greater greenhouse gas emissions pose increasing challenges for agriculture. Research led by our colleague David Lobell has shown that this trend is already evident today: there has been a yield decline for cereal crops since the 1980s of 10% for every 1°C (1.8°F) warming. Many recent studies confirm the potential for yield declines for staple cereal crops under greater warming, especially for wheat.
 
Different regions around the world are poised to experience climate change differently, and the risks depend on both the climate change experienced, and the human systems on the ground there. In the case of Iowan corn, the combination of the farming system and the climate poses less of a risk than wheat production in Australia, which is closer to its limits of viability today. Farmers can prepare for changes already underway, with more projected for the future, but the larger the changes experienced, the more difficult they will be to manage. This reinforces the climate change adage to “manage what we can’t avoid and avoid what we can’t manage” by reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. 
 
The research was conducted by an international team led by Dr. Caroline Ummenhofer of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute in Massachusetts, USA. We studied historical yield and climate records to understand the effects of climate on crop yields in the past, and then projected how this is likely to change in the future. To do so, we used the latest climate models (six simulations developed by groups in France, Japan, the US, and Australia) and scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions (a business-as-usual scenario of continuing high emissions of greenhouse gases, known as RCP 8.5, and a moderate stabilization scenario called RCP 4.5, which would involve emissions stabilizing at around 5 gigatons of carbon per year by the end of the century, compared with current emissions around 9 gigatons).

Reading list for my first climate summit

11/27/2015

 
Picture
Picture
Members of the Lund delegation to COP21 planning for Paris.
I'm excited and honored to be attending the climate summit in Paris as an accredited observer from Lund University. This is where nearly 200 countries will come together and aim to reach an agreement about how to change the path we're now on (a business-as-usual world headed for +4-5°C) to a more sustainable world that avoids the worst impacts of climate change. 

This will be my first time attending the United Nations climate negotiations, and I am looking forward to learning more about the process and how to make my research more relevant to policy, as well as to serve as an advisor to the Youth in Landscapes initiative at the Global Landscapes Forum, and take part in the Anthronaut Experience- a virtual reality hackathon with scientists, artists, designers, and virtual reality experts to make climate science narratives a 3D experience.

As I'm busy packing my bags, I'm gathering reading material for the 16-hour train ride to Paris. Here's what I'll be reading up on: 

General background: 
  • The Road to Paris blog curated by my friends and colleagues Denise Young and Johannes Mengel at the International Council for Science is a good place to start- see the highlights here. 
  • Seven key issues to be addressed at the Paris climate summit, by my friend and former labmate Simon Donner. 

Current perspectives: 
  • Both Nature and Science have special issues devoted to the history of the talks, and what's at stake.
  • The current issue of the Economist also features the Paris talks on their cover. 

Preparing for attending the meeting: 
  • The COP21 Information Hub is a good place to start for official info on schedules & logistics. 
  • Side events schedule
  • Science-related events, curated by Johannes and Nora at ICSU 
  • Help for Multilateral Environmental Agreement negotiators who encounter problems from Foundation for International Environmental Law & Development - helpful, plain language overview of how negotiations work, and what to do in situations such as "A more experienced negotiator bullies you" or "negative media reports about your country." 
  • Guidelines for civil society participation at UNFCCC 
  • RINGO news- Lund University is part of the "Research and Independent Non-Governmental Organizations to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change." RINGO hosts a daily briefing at 09:00. 

Keeping up with the negotiations in real time:
  • During the meeting, the Earth Negotiations Bulletin covers the previous day's events and where the negotiations now stand on their website and through Twitter.


I'll be following and Tweeting to the #COP21 hashtag, and also posting under the #LUCOP21 hashtag for members of the Lund University delegation at the COP. Please follow me on Twitter and let me know if you have any questions about the meeting, I'll do my best to answer! 

Visualizing the world’s climate perspectives

11/25/2015

 
                                             By Marius Sandvoll Weschke and Kimberly Nicholas  

The climate summit that will begin in Paris next week will attract delegates from more than 190 countries, all with the goal of signing an agreement to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The whole world will have their eyes on Paris when the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP) is underway, and the pressure on the politicians and decision makers going to Paris is high, not only from their own governments and voters, but from many other parts of society.

In particular, in recent months there has been a groundswell of statements on climate change from across sectors in society, from religious leaders, businesses, and scientific groups, to non-governmental organizations and national leaders. These statements outline the most important issues that their authors feel the Paris meeting should address. Among the statements gaining the most attention the last year an encyclical from Pope Francis, urging the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics to join the fight against climate change. A statement like this resonates far beyond the religious community, and it was portrayed in the media as a signal to politicians to pick up the pace on climate action.

While the high-level United Nations process can make climate policy seem like a distant issue, these statements show that a vast number of people and interest groups are keenly invested in the process.

We were interested in the key messages these diverse groups agree on. To analyze this, we analyzed 11 statements on climate change from religious groups, science, businesses, NGOs and the G7. The goal was to find out if the different groups speak the same language. That is, we wanted to see if the most commonly used words in the different statements overlap, which would indicate similar perspectives on the issue of climate change. We used an online word cloud generator to identify the 25 most commonly used words in each statement, and looked for words that were shared between statements (Figure 1).
Picture
Figure 1: Quantitative word analysis of 11 climate change statements originating from statements in five categories: four religious statements, three scientific, two business, one NGO consortium, and the G7 leaders. The four most commonly used words within each category are shown in each bubble, while the words that are overlapping between categories are marked with arrows. See footnote (1) for list of statements analyzed.
Our analysis showed the words ‘carbon’, ‘climate’, and ‘change’ are all among the most used words for science, business, NGOs and G7, but not the religious statements, indicating a technical and problem-oriented approach among these groups. The word ‘Earth’/’global’ shared similar ground between religion, science and NGOs, indicating a political or philosophical outlook shared by these groups. Surprisingly, religion and science shared the word ‘human’ among their most used words, indicating a shared worldview seeing people as both the cause and the solution to the problem of climate change.  

In the beginning of the study we hypothesized that there would be words that would be found among all categories, but as the figure shows, there was no word that all five sectors used most commonly. However, the existence of these statements still sends a strong message that the international community - from religious groups to businesses and from scientists to NGOs - wants their leaders and policymakers to focus on stronger action, leading to solutions to tackle human-induced carbon emissions driving climate change in Paris. At the same time, the religious perspectives highlight the social values these choices represent, and how fundamental they are to our way of life.  ​
Statements Analyzed:
Religious statements
: Pope Francis’ Encyclical (http://tinyurl.com/ptcm9bz), A Buddhist Declaration on Climate Change (http://tinyurl.com/p9ge6xj), Islamic Climate Declaration (http://tinyurl.com/nqg98o7), A Rabbinic Letter on the Climate Crisis (http://tinyurl.com/qcyzmqg).

Scientific statements: Earth Statement (http://tinyurl.com/nqw7d9b), Our Common Future under Climate Change (http://tinyurl.com/q5oy4x5), Planet under Pressure (http://tinyurl.com/7mvc9vq)
Business statements:  Institutional Investment Group on Climate Change (http://tinyurl.com/oaf6ooz), The World Bank: Putting a Price on Carbon (http://tinyurl.com/nrkagpx).
NGO statement: Paris 2015: getting a global agreement on climate change (http://tinyurl.com/mhbqt2r).
National leaders: Leaders’ Declaration G7 Summit 2015 (http://tinyurl.com/nmuagfd)          
This post summarizes research by Marius Sandvoll Weschke and Kimberly Nicholas presented at the Transformations conference held in Stockholm, October 2015. ​

Read an interview with Marius about this work in the Finnish newspaper Kyrkpressen here. 

Advice on the Academic Job Search

11/19/2015

 
Picture
Photo: www.flazingo.com under Creative Commons on Flickr.
Here are some tips I compiled with my friend and colleague Josh Goldstein when we were both finishing our PhDs and tackling the job market. Good luck, job seekers! 
  • Preparing during school
    1. Gain teaching experience, and document teaching effectiveness
      1. get teaching evaluation letters from professors that you TA for (ideally right after the class finishes while thoughts are fresh in their mind)
      2. get evaluated by CTL and save evals
      3. make up your own evals for students you mentor
      4. do mid-quarter evals for sections/classes you teach
      5. consider students writing letters for you
      6. consider developing or co-teaching your own course
    2. Research experience
      1. Publish! Aim for good journals.
      2. Present at conferences
    3. Academic/professional service and development
      1. Society involvement
      2. Campus and departmental leadership
      3. Outreach
      4. Professional networking- make and maintain contacts; use conferences for networking (make meal plans)
    4. Professional materials
      1. Develop a professional web site where you can list your research and teaching interests and accomplishments.
      2. Maintain a complete and up-to-date CV
      3. Write a catchy, current bio for your web page and IPER web page (make it something you would like to be introduced by at a conference where you were presenting)
      4. Order transcripts if you don’t have them in hand.
    5. Vision
      1. Be thinking about, and be able to articulate, how your specific dissertation projects fit into a larger research program, directions you’d go in the future.

  • Applying for jobs

  1. Look for job postings
    1. Professional societies (Ecological Society of America, Women’s Earth Science Network, etc.)
    2. Chronicle of Higher Education
    3. Higheredjobs.com, phDjobs.com
    4. Science, Nature, etc.
    5. Word of mouth- let professional contacts know you’re looking and to keep you in mind
    6. Check websites for schools of particular interest
    7. Check out academic wiki to anonymously post status of current searches: http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/BiologyPositions

  1. Decide on application strategy in consultation with advisors and any significant others
    1. Departmental, geographical, two-body considerations, number of applications, faculty jobs vs. postdocs
    2. Be aware of timing considerations (most ads in the US are posted August-December but there are exceptions; be aware of important professional conferences where interviews are conducted)

  1. Prepare “Dossier”
    1. Everything described below takes considerable time (especially the first time around) but it is definitely time well spent to ensure that you make a strong and exciting sales pitch for yourself!
    2. Talk with mentors about job postings; ask if they know anyone there (a good word from a friend can really help your case!)
    3. Maintain and update CV, have friends, profs, counselors look at it. Consider creative categories for interdisciplinary work. List academic references w/ contact info on last page.
    4. For all materials, make sure the are visually appealing (nice font, plenty of white space on the page, sub-headings, bold or bullet points where appropriate… make them “skimmable”.)
    5. Draft research statement
      1. Focus around big questions your research aims to address. Consider starting with a question or puzzle that motivates your overall research program before getting into specifics. Try to avoid chronological descriptions of your research (first I did this, then I did that), which tend to be less engaging and read like grad school statements of purpose.
      2. Instead, highlight 2-3 key areas of research or questions or sub-fields, and describe the methods/approaches you use within those areas
      3. Cite concrete examples from past & current work
      4. Be sure to offer some ideas about what you would do in the future, particularly at that particular institution to take advantage of current resources/strengths.
    6. Draft teaching statement
      1. Brainstorm classes you would teach- those currently offered in department (you never know which are someone’s undisputed territory vs. something everyone wants to get rid of, so indicate a willingness to co-teach or other flexibility), and new ones you could offer
      2. Describe teaching and mentoring philosophy
      3. Convey interest in and commitment to teaching
    7. Draft cover letter
      1. A good idea, even if not called for in job ads
      2. Keep to 1 page, convey enthusiasm for position, be specific about why this position, highlight key strengths from CV and rest of application
    8. In general, try to make your application really reflect you, rather than trying to make it a “perfect fit” with the job description (and thus having to rewrite it every time, and also feel like you are trying to be all things to all departments). Have some specific parts (for me, first and last paragraph of cover letter, sprinkled throughout research statement, and in the classes section of teaching statement) that you tailor to the job and institution, but work to get the majority widely applicable. You can work on a “generic” version of materials with specific things tailored to each place highlighted to make future cutting & pasting easier
      1. Job postings vary widely in how detailed vs. general they are. In general, it’s good to specifically address in your statements and/or cover letter key items from the posting (e.g., specific classes or research topics that they expect the candidate to undertake).
      2. Communicate with the search chair when a job is posted. A conversation to find out more about what the department is looking for can be really valuable to understand if this is the right fit for you, and also what to emphasize in your application. 
    9. Ask faculty in advance if they can write strong letters of support for you (asking for "strong" gives them a graceful out if for some reason they can't rave about you, in that case much better to get another letter writer). If they accept, be organized and efficient when sending them info organized by due date. A reminder as the due date approaches can be a good idea. Be sure to keep them posted and thank them for their help- a note or a treat is appreciated! 
    10. Scan complete copies of transcripts to submit for unofficial versions.
    11. Organize and scan teaching evaluations and other materials to demonstrate teaching effectiveness. 

  • Submit app and follow up
    1. Read the job description carefully to make sure that you submit everything that they ask for (and usually no more, though some things like # of references can be flexible).
    2. Keep track of due dates, where you have applied, and current application status (reject/no answer/etc.)
    3. Respond promptly to any requests for additional information
    4. Might be a good idea to contact places you have heard nothing back from to ensure they have all your materials, and perhaps inquire about search timing.

  •  Getting a phone call from the search chair!
    1. Try to sound like a potential colleague, and not like a surprised grad student interrupted while having lunch with friends, as I did my first time around! (Avoid saying, “Sweet!” like I did. But express enthusiasm for the position and thank them for inviting you to interview).
    2. Scheduling the interview- be aware it's an advantage to be the last candidate they meet. Push (nicely!) for the last date offered. 
    3. Have a few questions ready to ask; you can also plan to make an appointment to ask more specifics later
      1. Your presentations
        1. How many talks, when, and what format are you giving? (Research seminar/job talk; “chalk talk”; guest lecture for undergrad class; part of existing seminar series)
        2. Can you get scheduled for some prep time before your talks?
        3. What audiovisuals are available? (presumably ppt)
        4. If giving a guest lecture, ask to see the syllabus, copy of assigned reading (think about assigning your own), number of students in class, usual format of class (discussion, activity, lecture, lab?)
        5. How much time usual for Q&A?
      2. Meeting with people
        1. Who is on the search committee (you will be meeting with all of them- research them & their work).
        2. Also look at other junior faculty and people outside the department to meet with.
        3. Request (insist) on meeting with undergrad and grad students (important to assess department climate, your future grad students, and win bonus “s/he cares!” points)
      3. Department and school
        1. What’s the history of the department? Hiring plans for the future?
        2. What’s the teaching load?
      4. Will you have a chance to see labs, research facilities, offices, surrounding community?
      5. Logistics
        1. Usually they will put you in touch with an administrator to make your air, hotel, transit etc.  arrangements. Probably easier to book your own ticket and get reimbursed.
        2. Work hard to get last scheduled interview slot (early candidates are often a vehicle for committees to fight out their differences)
        3. Ask for copy of meeting schedule (including locations) and get map of campus ahead of time
  •  The Visit!
    1. Bring your A game! (And realize it’s in everyone’s best interest if you do a great job.)
    2. Interviews typically last 1-2 days (be well rested in advance, probably won’t be your best night’s sleep ever the night before)
    3. Preparing your “job talk”/research seminar:
      1. Be sure to put your research in context (five minutes on why we should care about this before diving into details)
      2. Tailor to the locale to the extent possible (give local examples or mention possible collaborations appropriate to that place)
      3. Give a run-through to friends and colleagues at home ahead of time. Provide a written form for feedback for those who have to leave early, and to capture small things like “fix title font on slide 7” and avoid having to detail them on everyone’s time. (Add slide numbers to faciliate this.) 
      4. Consider practicing the talk at the Center for Teaching and Learning, using video critique and other resources there.
    4. Packing for the trip:
      1. Carry-on bag only (no luggage to lose)
      2. Multiple copies of your talks, in multiple formats (on laptop, USB drive, email to yourself)
      3. Dress for success… suits! Accessories. Shoes. Professional briefcase/laptop bag. Professional folder for papers. Watch. Consider setting your cell phone alarm to go off at the end of appointments so you can exit gracefully and not be late for the next person.
      4. Cash for meals, taxis etc; envelope for receipts (save everything)
      5. Print out your meeting schedule and campus map to bring with you
      6. Bring easy to eat and non-messy snacks for the interview day(s) when you're running around! 
    5. Interview strategy
      1. Make quick notes you can refer to in the hallway between meetings on each person you’re meeting with (e.g., Mongolia, writing, saxophone to remind you of the topics you want to discuss with them based on your Internet stalking!)
      2. let them take the lead in interviews, but also be prepared to ask questions of everyone you meet, from the Dean to students
      3. Be prepared to ask and answer LOTS of questions! (See separate articles for examples)
      4. Consider how you’ll demonstrate independence from your dissertation advisor and his/her research agenda (esp. for natural sciences)
      5. For student meetings:
        1. Circulate a sign-in list so you can keep names straight and get their emails to follow up later if needed (students can be hard to find on the web)
        2. These are fun and important meetings; remember that students will often have some say in the decision.
      6. Teaching
        1. Be ready to discuss 2-4 classes you would teach, including potential texts and labs; be flexible. It looks great if you have a syllabus outline or can talk about the texts you’d use.
      7. Ask for a bathroom break if you need one!
      8. Meals: order food with care (not the time to don the bib for the crab with spaghetti). Limit alcohol consumption. Follow the lead of your interviewees in how much to talk about work vs. more casual conversation, but remember to stay professional- you are being evaluated on everything you say and do! 


  •  Follow-up, Offers, Negotiation
    1. Thank search chair promptly after your visit (email is fine). If very interested in the position, say so and contact others with whom you met.
      1. If you are pursuing multiple positions, ask the search chair about the department’s expected timeline for making a decision; this will help you figure out a plan for juggling the different timelines inevitably associated with your opportunities.
    2. Getting an offer!
      1. Congrats!!! This is a huge honor and well-deserved recognition that you are a superstar. But you’re not finished yet… so keep your A game up.
      2. Offer could come by phone or email. Sound enthusiastic!
        1. get details about the offer
        2. talk about a timeline for making a decision or taking the next step in the negotiating process.
    3. Negotations – a start 
      1. Get advice from your mentors – they are here to help you and probably thrilled to do so!
        1. when talking with them, get a sense for what is typical in the department in which you will be hired (adjusted for the type of institution where the offer comes from)
      2. After considering your offer (and the advice from mentors), brainstorm changes and additions to your offer that you’d like to talk about with the search chair
        1. What do you need to be successful in the position? [salary, startup, teaching load, etc.]. Consider a lab budget for equipment, etc.
      3. Carve out time for self-reflection
        1. is this the job for you?
        2. how does it compare to other jobs you have applied for?
      4. Try to find neutral people at the institution that you can talk to about the general feeling of the place (e.g., friends of friends; junior and senior faculty are useful to talk with)
      5. Be patient and don’t feel (or appear) anxious to say “yes” or “no”… easier said then done! We have heard the conventional wisdom that once a department has made you an offer, they’d like to work with you to get you to “yes”. So keep in good communication and be fair, but also push for things that you will need to succeed.
    4. Not getting the initial offer
      1. Thank the search chair for their time, say that you enjoyed the opportunity, and ask for feedback on areas of improvement in the future.
      2. If still interested in the job, stay in touch with the search chair, since people do turn down job offers. Also, realize it was a great opportunity to broaden your connections and present your work to new audiences, and it may lead to other opportunities down the line. Consider if any new collaboration opportunities arose. 

Advice on applying to grad school 

8/28/2015

 
Picture
Image from Flickr user waverleo under Creative Commons
    Fall is graduate school application time! Many of my former students are interested in pursuing a PhD, and are asking me for my advice on applying to grad school. Great!

    Here are some of my top tips, and a suggested template of a letter to contact a potential advisor at the end: 
    1. Clarify your motivation for getting a PhD. The more clearly you can articulate this, the more convincing you'll be as an applicant. While there are many important components of graduate training, the basic point of getting a PhD is to train you to do independent research, so you need to explain why this is something you want to do.

      Your motivation might be because you love research, you are inspired by a particular topic or question you want to answer, you want to teach at the university level (which nearly always requires a PhD), you think it sounds fun to spend half a decade pursuing the scholarly life, your dream job (in or outside academia) will require or benefit greatly if you have a PhD. Being good at school or not knowing what else to do are not great reasons here. 

      One example: Years after reviewing a graduate fellowship application, I still remember a woman whose dream was to run a tropical rainforest research station for undergraduates to study abroad, like one where she had studied. Her passion for the experience of both research and teaching was clear throughout her application, and totally convinced me that she should pursue a PhD. 

    2. Formulate your research vision. This is hard, but critical. You'll have to write a full proposal for your application, but initially a core question is enough to contact a potential advisor.

      Imagine what you would be excited to have answered five years down the line, when you can put those three magical letters after your name. Try to get beyond a topic (climate change, ecosystem services) into a puzzle or question or case study that you want to investigate.

      The more specific you can be, the more focused and serious you look to potential advisors. Don’t forget to think about what impact you want to have with your research (are you trying to advance basic knowledge, inform management, change policy?) to design your question accordingly.

      Don’t worry about being too tied down to the project you propose, and don’t emphasize that everything is subject to change. In my experience, this is just assumed in research in general, and for a PhD project in particular. The more clearly you can articulate an exciting but doable project, the more convincing you are as a potential researcher. It’s really common for PhD projects to change dramatically in response to opportunities, evolving interests, or other changing conditions (in my case, from thinking I would study tropical forests to actually studying vineyards in California). So sound confident! 

      This piece of advice links closely with #3, because it’s important that you find potential advisors who are doing work that is closely enough related to what you want to do that they will be excited to work with you.

    3. Identify potential PhD advisors. The amount of interaction you have with your supervisor varies by field (in my experience, more in natural sciences and less in social sciences and humanities), but in my opinion this is critical to your future success in science (and data supports this). You want to find someone who meets two criteria (which my mentor Pam Matson summed up as "brilliant, and nice"): 

      - S/he is a good researcher (working with questions, methods, projects that you find interesting, and can help you learn in these areas). You can identify this from their track record- their papers, website, CV. This should be done before contacting them. 

      -S/he is a good person (someone whose integrity you respect, and whose personality you will get along with over many years in sometimes stressful situations). After you find someone who meets the first criteria above and have established your research compatibility, be sure to assess this second criteria before accepting a position in their lab. Assessing this requires talking to people who know them personally (be sure to directly ask their current and former grad students "Would you recommend joining Dr. X's lab?") and forming your own impression from meeting them in person.

      I suggest you at least skim one paper of theirs before writing them, so that you can mention something specific that stands out to you in their work. Don’t worry if you don’t understand all the details and methods. Hopefully they write clearly enough that you can understand the research question and their answer to it, and determine if it’s something that interests you. 

    4. Identify funding sources. Science is supported by convincing people with money that you have a good idea that is worth pursuing. PhD students (at least in most sciences) are generally paid a stipend that covers tuition and enough salary to live on. This can come from two basic sources: a scholarship or fellowship granted to you personally by a funder or your department, or a grant for a research project granted to your advisor.

      In the first scenario, you will be in a great position to pursue the questions that most interest you if you are able to secure your own funding. Further, a lot of success in a research career depends on writing successful grants, so it’s good to start practicing now. These sources are usually national, so it depends where you are applying, and will require some digging around to find them. I'm most familiar with the US funding system, which includes federal agencies like the NSF Graduate Fellow Research Program, scholarships from NASA and the EPA, and university fellowships (which often are specific to your department, and may or may not require a separate application).

      In the second scenario, if your potential advisor has a grant to pursue a line of research you’re excited about, that’s great. You will hopefully be part of a team that can make your research more collaborative and fun, as well as probably progress faster than starting from scratch. Your advisor may be more invested in your research, and better able to mentor you in research design and analysis, if it’s more closely aligned with her own interests. Still, be cautious about joining established projects with set deadlines and deliverables – you want to make sure you will have space to develop your own ideas, not only implement out someone else's. 

      Mentioning that you are applying for your own funding to a potential advisor shows that you are serious and well-informed. Some lucky departments guarantee graduate student funding- this is great, but you’ll still be expected (or at least strongly encouraged) to apply for your own money. And generally advisors appreciate if you apply for your own money as well. If you get it, they’ll still have funding to hire another qualified student, plus get extra-smart you as a bonus.

    5. Contact your potential advisor. I recommend a succinct email that expresses your interest, highlights your strengths, and clearly asks them to get back to you. Keep it snappy- professors get an insane amount of email.

      Here’s my suggestion for a rough template to get you started:

      Dear Dr. X, 

      I came across your work through X (conference/paper/my professor X’s recommendation). I am very interested in your approach to (topic) using (method/specific thing they do that interests you). 

      I’m writing to inquire if you are accepting PhD students in your lab for fall 2016? 

      I am aiming to pursue a PhD dissertation focusing on X topic, specifically looking at the question of X puzzle in X case for X purpose. 

      My background is in X bachelors from X university/Y masters from Y university. My research to date has focused on X, which I investigated most recently in my master’s thesis on X topic in X place, finding that X key highlight (please see attached thesis FYI). I have written about this work in a popular science blog here (link) and am currently preparing the manuscript for submission to the journal of X with my supervisor X. 

      I also have experience in X business/NGO/policy/government, where I accomplished X. For more details, please see my attached CV. 

      Regarding funding, I am currently applying for funding from X, X and X scholarship agencies to support the project I’ve outlined above. If there are any additional funding sources that you think might be a good fit to support this work, I would really appreciate any tips. And of course, if you have any currently funded projects that could support a PhD student, I would love to hear about them. 

      Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. 

      Best regards, 

      You

      ----

      If you don’t hear back from them in 2 weeks, resend your message with a polite note at the top: “Dear Dr. X, I thought my earlier message may have caught you at a busy time. I’m still very keen to pursue a PhD in your lab, and hoping you can let me know if you are accepting new students next fall. Thank you, X” 

      If there’s someone you’re really excited about who hasn’t gotten back to you, consider picking up the phone to call them. Bold move, but it just might work! People get a bajillion emails, but few phone calls nowadays. Practice a shortened version of the text above to ask them.

      6. Contact several advisors! When you are first contacting advisors, your goal should be to identify several people who you would be excited to work with, in departments that look good, in cities where you would like to live. 

      It’s smart to apply to at least several schools (I just checked and I applied to seven PhD programs, which now seems excessive- but at least three is good). You don’t know where you’ll get in, and you’ll have to consider personal factors about where you want to live, so it’s good to have options.

      Most advisors will be contacted by many students and will have many applicants for each open position in their lab. So, you both are on the lookout for the person who will be the best fit! Most advisors will understand this (some may even ask where else you are applying).

      That said, if you apply for external fellowships, you may have to specify your top choice for where you want to go and who you want to work with (depending on the fellowship). In this case, it’s important to share your plans with your potential advisor and get their agreement to support your application. In any case, if you really click with a potential advisor, consider asking them to give you feedback on your external fellowship application (for something like NSF GRFP, not for their own university applications where they would have a conflict of interest). Hopefully their comments can help you strengthen your proposal. 

      In any case, good communication with a potential advisor is important, so ask them questions to clarify expectations or any points of confusion. 

      Hope this helps- let me know if you have any comments! 



<<Previous
Forward>>

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Advice
    Agriculture
    Climate Change
    Conferences
    COP21
    Divestment
    Early Career
    Ecosystem Services
    Grantwriting
    Policy
    Research
    Scicomm
    Teaching
    Wine
    Writing

    Archives

    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    July 2018
    January 2018
    November 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    RSS Feed

Contact information
Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies 


Visiting address

Josephson Room 117 
Biskopsgatan 5
Lund, Sweden

mailing address

LUCSUS, P.O. Box 170
SE-221 00
Lund, Sweden

virtual addresses 

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-7851